Cosmetic Testing with Animals is Cruel Essay - 1302 Words.

Testing on animals has become an every day occurrence and routinely happens in the cosmetic industry. It costs billions of dollars each year and produces ineffective results. Animals are treated inhumanely during testing, as they are shaved and have chemicals spread onto their bodies and chemicals sprayed into their eyes.

Animal testing in the cosmetic industry is known to use inhuman methods to test various products. There will always be arguments for and against such kind of testing. Here's a look at some ways adopted by companies all over the world to make sure their cosmetic products are not harmful to humans.

The Ugly Secrets of Animal Testing in the Cosmetic Industry.

Cosmetic research with animal testing is a selfish way to better the lives of humans alone. The number of companies that test their products on animals has come a long way the last several decades. Progress toward the use of alternatives to animal testing will continue to gain strength as awareness and support for alternatives is made known. Promoting alternatives to these experiments could.Animal Testing in the Beauty Industry 746 total views In March 2013, the EU passed new legislation which banned the sale of all cosmetic products tested on animals in the EU, regardless of where in the world the test took place.In the US, the cosmetics industry has also made big steps forward. Two decades ago nearly all products were tested on animals, but many companies now pride themselves on having eliminated.


The cosmetic industry should find a more equitable way to fund the buyers because costs for animal testing causes even more of an ongoing reason as to why more and more of one product is not being sold. These issues result in the extinction of brands and more protests against animal testing.The European Union introduced a ban on the testing of finished cosmetic products (shampoo, make-up, toothpaste, etc.) on animals in 2004. Five years later, it also ended the testing of ingredients, following this up with a ban on the import and sale of new cosmetics tested on animals abroad, in 2013.

European Union law bans the sale of any cosmetic product that has been tested on animals in finished form after 2004, as well as cosmetics containing ingredients subject to new animal testing after 2013.

Read More

Eminent cosmetic companies such as Maybelline, Sally Hansen, Neutrogena, and Cover Girl test their makeup products on animals. Companies use cosmetic testing as a defense to avoid law suits in case anything happens. Even Dove tests on animals which led to the death of its trademark.

Read More

Animal Testing in the Makeup Industry. Your makeup is pretty did you know it was tested on an animal. Animal cruelty is known to be one of the most controversial topics around the world. With there being thousands of opinions on this issue, with the cosmetic industry being number one using animal cruelty more than anyone. Many people today.

Read More

Animal Testing Essay Example. Cons of Cosmetic Animal Testing. Animal testing has a long history during which it helped to make important discoveries in the field of medicine and pharmacology, prevent people from harm or even death from ineffective or inappropriate products. Without a doubt, the procedure did a lot of good for the humanity in terms of protecting and improving health of people.

Read More

Animal skin and organs are not the same as human skin and organs; therefore, cosmetic testing on animal skin and organs is irrelevant to human skin and organs. Animals have different biological systems than humans do therefore the tests cannot be as accurate. Not only is animal testing inhumane it is inaccurate. Animal tests do not predict antidotes for product toxicity and do not keep toxic.

Read More

Animal Experimentation in Cosmetics and Household Items In the era of anti-animal testing, the cosmetic industry has taken a lot of wrath from animal activist. When looking at the list of accomplishments researchers and scientists have made in the medical field because of animal testing, it is difficult to make a lawful argument as to why one would be against it (Harvard, 1999). However.

Read More

According to lawyer, Kelly McNeal in her essay “Death: The Price of Beauty: Animal Testing and the Cosmetics Industry”, testing cosmetics on animals began in 1933 when a woman went blind after applying her mascara. In 1938, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in order to make sure that cosmetics would be safe for human use in the.

Read More

This essay explains whether animal testing should be allowed or not in order to produce cosmetic products by stating the ethical reason to protest and stating existence of the substitution method. This research concludes that animal testing can be both beneficial but also very crucial, should be banned at some point; however, the substitute method has found some defect which leads that medical.

Read More

On April 15, 1980, Henry Spira animal rights advocate seized out a full-page promotion in The New York Times to denounce the practice of animal in the health testing of beauty care products. The inquiry suggested using Draize test, which included trickling elements, for example, toluene in rabbits, causing torment and visual impairment.

Read More

Numerous species are used for the testing processes. 85% of the animal population being held for this work are rats, mice, fish, reptiles, and amphibians. Guinea pigs are the most common animal used by the cosmetics industry for testing. Public and private institutions also use primates, hamsters, and rabbits to get the results they want.

Read More